With maximum version explicitly set, TLSv1.3 will not be unexpectedly
enabled if nginx compiled with OpenSSL 1.1.0 (without TLSv1.3 support)
will be run with OpenSSL 1.1.1 (with TLSv1.3 support).

BoringSSL currently requires SSL_CTX_set_max_proto_version(TLS1_3_VERSION)
to be able to enable TLS 1.3.  This is because by default max protocol
version is set to TLS 1.2, and the SSL_OP_NO_* options are merely used
as a blacklist within the version range specified using the
SSL_CTX_set_min_proto_version() and SSL_CTX_set_max_proto_version()
functions.

With this change, we now call SSL_CTX_set_max_proto_version() with an
explicit maximum version set.  This enables TLS 1.3 with BoringSSL.
As a side effect, this change also limits maximum protocol version to
the newest protocol we know about, TLS 1.3.  This seems to be a good
change, as enabling unknown protocols might have unexpected results.

Additionally, we now explicitly call SSL_CTX_set_min_proto_version()
with 0.  This is expected to help with Debian system-wide default
of MinProtocol set to TLSv1.2, see
http://mailman.nginx.org/pipermail/nginx-ru/2017-October/060411.html.

Note that there is no SSL_CTX_set_min_proto_version macro in BoringSSL,
so we call SSL_CTX_set_min_proto_version() and SSL_CTX_set_max_proto_version()
as long as the TLS1_3_VERSION macro is defined.

The "no suitable signature algorithm" errors are reported by OpenSSL 1.1.1
when using TLSv1.3 if there are no shared signature algorithms.  In
particular, this can happen if the client limits available signature
algorithms to something we don't have a certificate for, or to an empty
list.  For example, the following command:

    openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:8443 -sigalgs rsa_pkcs1_sha1

will always result in the "no suitable signature algorithm" error
as the "rsa_pkcs1_sha1" algorithm refers solely to signatures which
appear in certificates and not defined for use in TLS 1.3 handshake
messages.

The SSL_R_NO_COMMON_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHMS error is what BoringSSL returns
in the same situation.

The "no suitable key share" errors are reported by OpenSSL 1.1.1 when
using TLSv1.3 if there are no shared groups (that is, elliptic curves).
In particular, it is easy enough to trigger by using only a single
curve in ssl_ecdh_curve:

    ssl_ecdh_curve secp384r1;

and using a different curve in the client:

    openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:443 -curves prime256v1

On the client side it is seen as "sslv3 alert handshake failure",
"SSL alert number 40":

0:error:14094410:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert handshake failure:ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:1528:SSL alert number 40

It can be also triggered with default ssl_ecdh_curve by using a curve
which is not in the default list (X25519, prime256v1, X448, secp521r1,
secp384r1):

    openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:8443 -curves brainpoolP512r1

Given that many clients hardcode prime256v1, these errors might become
a common problem with TLSv1.3 if ssl_ecdh_curve is redefined.  Previously
this resulted in not using ECDH with such clients, but with TLSv1.3 it
is no longer possible and will result in a handshake failure.

The SSL_R_NO_SHARED_GROUP error is what BoringSSL returns in the same
situation.

Seen at:

https://serverfault.com/questions/932102/nginx-ssl-handshake-error-no-suitable-key-share

LibreSSL 2.8.0 "added const annotations to many existing APIs from OpenSSL,
making interoperability easier for downstream applications".  This includes
the const change in the SSL_CTX_sess_set_get_cb() callback function (see
9dd43f4ef67e), which breaks compilation.

To fix this, added a condition on how we redefine OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
when working with LibreSSL (see 382fc7069e3a).  With LibreSSL 2.8.0,
we now set OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER to 0x1010000fL (OpenSSL 1.1.0), so the
appropriate conditions in the code will use "const" as it happens with
OpenSSL 1.1.0 and later versions.

In OpenSSL 1.1.0 the SSL_CTRL_CLEAR_OPTIONS macro was removed, so
conditional compilation test on it results in SSL_clear_options()
and SSL_CTX_clear_options() not being used.  Notably, this caused
"ssl_prefer_server_ciphers off" to not work in SNI-based virtual
servers if server preference was switched on in the default server.

It looks like the only possible fix is to test OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER
explicitly.

Starting with OpenSSL 1.1.0, SSL_R_UNSUPPORTED_PROTOCOL instead of
SSL_R_UNKNOWN_PROTOCOL is reported when a protocol is disabled via
an SSL_OP_NO_* option.

Additionally, SSL_R_VERSION_TOO_LOW is reported when using MinProtocol
or when seclevel checks (as set by @SECLEVEL=n in the cipher string)
rejects a protocol, and this is what happens with SSLv3 and @SECLEVEL=1,
which is the default.

There is also the SSL_R_VERSION_TOO_HIGH error code, but it looks like
it is not possible to trigger it.

The "http request" and "https proxy request" errors cannot happen
with HTTP due to pre-handshake checks in ngx_http_ssl_handshake(),
but can happen when SSL is used in stream and mail modules.

On Linux recvmsg() syscall may return a zero-length client address when
receiving a datagram from an unbound unix datagram socket.  It is usually
assumed that socket address has at least the sa_family member.  Zero-length
socket address caused buffer over-read in functions which receive socket
address, for example ngx_sock_ntop().  Typically the over-read resulted in
unexpected socket family followed by session close.  Now a fake socket address
is allocated instead of a zero-length client address.

On some platforms (for example, Linux with glibc 2.12-2.25) IPv4 transparent
proxying is available, but IPv6 transparent proxying is not.  The entire feature
is enabled in this case and NGX_HAVE_TRANSPARENT_PROXY macro is set to 1.
Previously, an attempt to enable transparency for an IPv6 socket was silently
ignored in this case and was usually followed by a bind(2) EADDRNOTAVAIL error
(ticket #1487).  Now the error is generated for unavailable IPv6 transparent
proxy.